<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Compact Camera Search, from the S80 to the LX2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comments.deasil.com/2007/02/26/compact-camera-search-from-the-s80-to-the-lx2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2007/02/26/compact-camera-search-from-the-s80-to-the-lx2/</link>
	<description>escape colon w q</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: On our unhealthy obsession with features</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2007/02/26/compact-camera-search-from-the-s80-to-the-lx2/#comment-9620</link>
		<dc:creator>On our unhealthy obsession with features</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2007/02/26/compact-camera-search-from-the-s80-to-the-lx2/#comment-9620</guid>
		<description>[...] and the camera makers kept the sensors at a nice 5MP or 6MP. (I know, I&#8217;ve complained about too many megapixels [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and the camera makers kept the sensors at a nice 5MP or 6MP. (I know, I&#8217;ve complained about too many megapixels [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breakfast Links: All Gear Edition</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2007/02/26/compact-camera-search-from-the-s80-to-the-lx2/#comment-9070</link>
		<dc:creator>Breakfast Links: All Gear Edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2007/02/26/compact-camera-search-from-the-s80-to-the-lx2/#comment-9070</guid>
		<description>[...] that its film is like 7x the size of the largest compact sensors (say the 1/1.8&#8243; found on my LX2) it&#8217;s not sacrificing anything. It obviously won&#8217;t take as sharp pictures as a real [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that its film is like 7x the size of the largest compact sensors (say the 1/1.8&#8243; found on my LX2) it&#8217;s not sacrificing anything. It obviously won&#8217;t take as sharp pictures as a real [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
