<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did Open Source ever have a halo?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comments.deasil.com/2007/02/26/did-open-source-ever-have-a-halo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2007/02/26/did-open-source-ever-have-a-halo/</link>
	<description>escape colon w q</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 18:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft v. Free Software &#124; #comments</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2007/02/26/did-open-source-ever-have-a-halo/#comment-1548</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft v. Free Software &#124; #comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 17:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2007/02/26/did-open-source-ever-have-a-halo/#comment-1548</guid>
		<description>[...] If there was any question about Microsoft&#8217;s stance on Free Software (and really, there wasn&#8217;t) this ought to settle it. Microsoft is claiming that free software violates 235 of its patents and it wants royalties from distributors and users. It was obvious that this was coming given their recent Novell deal. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If there was any question about Microsoft&#8217;s stance on Free Software (and really, there wasn&#8217;t) this ought to settle it. Microsoft is claiming that free software violates 235 of its patents and it wants royalties from distributors and users. It was obvious that this was coming given their recent Novell deal. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
