<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the Federated Media/Microsoft incident</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comments.deasil.com/2007/06/23/on-the-federated-mediamicrosoft-incident/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2007/06/23/on-the-federated-mediamicrosoft-incident/</link>
	<description>escape colon w q</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Print v. Digital Followup</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2007/06/23/on-the-federated-mediamicrosoft-incident/#comment-8968</link>
		<dc:creator>Print v. Digital Followup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2007/06/23/on-the-federated-mediamicrosoft-incident/#comment-8968</guid>
		<description>[...] know how to monetize things. That&#8217;s why there was that kerfuffle sometime ago when Federated Media decided to get creative with their advertising and started to mix editorial [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] know how to monetize things. That&#8217;s why there was that kerfuffle sometime ago when Federated Media decided to get creative with their advertising and started to mix editorial [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More on the Google PageRank Brouhaha</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2007/06/23/on-the-federated-mediamicrosoft-incident/#comment-7164</link>
		<dc:creator>More on the Google PageRank Brouhaha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2007/06/23/on-the-federated-mediamicrosoft-incident/#comment-7164</guid>
		<description>[...] given an ethics based argument from TechCrunch. They are the ones after all who supported that Federated Media fiasco a few months back where they were effectively endorsing various advertisers without [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] given an ethics based argument from TechCrunch. They are the ones after all who supported that Federated Media fiasco a few months back where they were effectively endorsing various advertisers without [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 8 posts from June! &#124; #comments</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2007/06/23/on-the-federated-mediamicrosoft-incident/#comment-2277</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 8 posts from June! &#124; #comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 14:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2007/06/23/on-the-federated-mediamicrosoft-incident/#comment-2277</guid>
		<description>[...] 8. On the Federated Media/Microsoft incident [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 8. On the Federated Media/Microsoft incident [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
