Palm Foleo, it’s not a smartphone, not yet a laptop.
Scott sent me a link to this InfoWorld piece about their hands on with a Foleo. Like Britney was, the Foleo seems to be at an awkward transitional space and it doesn’t seem to know what to do. It’s grown up past being a smartphone, it’s bigger with a sexy full width keyboard and big screen. But it can’t do all the things a laptop can do, yet. It’s application list is small and it remains to be seen whether or not Palm will be able to woo in the sizeable developer base necessary to make it a success. It could be chicken and egg’y since it can’t be a success without the developers but why would developers move over to it without it already having a big user base? Britney’s producers know it, Steve Jobs knows it, you have to make it sexy.
For my money, given what I know about it, I think that it is either a few hundred dollars to expensive - if it was $300 it’d be much easier to see people just picking one up. As it is, $600 is still enough money to prevent most casual buyers. See how expensive the X-Box and how a price drop jumped up it’s sell rate. Alternately, at 2.5 pounds, it’s small, but I can still get laptops lighter than it, sure more expensive, but potentially lighter as well and obviously more full featured. If it clocked in at 1.5 pounds, that’d be something new and not otherwise attainable in the laptop world.
I mean who knows, it isn’t all about a spec sheet. The iPhone proved that. It’s about the user experience and how people use it. If it is awesome enough, people will put up with its quirks to bask in its strengths. But as far as I know this is the first real hands on review I’ve seen and it pretty much confirms what I believe most of the internet thought of the device based on the little marketing we’ve seen thus far. It doesn’t seem as though, despite Hawkins’ protestations, that the interface and the device itself are compelling enough on their own. Palm’s got it’s work cut out, all I know is I’m not buying any stock in anticipation of this device’s release. I wonder how many hardware man hours this took out of Palm’s life and what those man hours might have meant for the Treo line if the Foleo was not created. Imagine what the 700P could have been instead of the fiasco it was. If only…
UPDATE: Ok, well.. update from between the time I wrote this and the time I’m posting it…. two things have come out that support this thing. A new video with Ben Combee talking about and showing off the Foleo. It’s a pretty good video, Ben’s obviously digging the video and on PIC he’s winning converts. Personally, I remain skeptical, but this is certainly the right direction for Palm marketing to go in. Keep it up.
But where Palm giveth, Palm also taketh away. In this case, Palm taketh away the 700 update that was so long in arriving. Similar to the fate of the Sprint one, which I believe still has yet to resurface. It is unbelievable how awful Palm is. They should offer to replace every 700P out there with a 680. I’m pretty surprised there has been no class action lawsuit about this yet.
Predictably, neither of these are showing up on Palm’s blog. Here’s my guess, the video shows up (maybe) with a graf or two of really boring text. The 700 fiasco shows up with some apologist blathering, nothing meaningful to be immediately followed by a long post about nothing. It is just possible that they could post the 700 update post and follow it up with a nice long post including the above video, but I don’t think they have it in them.








August 13th, 2007 at 1:16 pm
you did NOT just compare a palm product to britney spears!
also, you are no longer a palm guy anymore. move on with your identity.
August 13th, 2007 at 1:31 pm
oh YES I DID! and you loved it and it gave me an excuse to watch that video guilt free… you know, for research. Matt Cutts says I need to have more pictures in my blog. So there it is. Don’t say you didn’t love that post because I know what’s in your heart.
August 13th, 2007 at 1:32 pm
Thanks for the mention of my video. I’m excited about the device, but I also know it’s not for everyone. I saw a lot of interest from Linux hacker types while at LinuxWorld, and I bet we’ll see some really interesting uses for it once it’s released. The hardware can support a small desktop-like distribution, like an ARM-compiled version of Damn Small Linux, but we chose not to go that route, instead wanting to try to get as much speed and efficiency out of our own software development. Since we didn’t go far down the other route, it’s hard to tell how it would have performed with that, but I think we’d lose a lot of the PDA-like simplicity that makes using the Foleo nice.
I’ve been watching efforts like the Nokia N800 that have tried to use X and GTK, and I still find their UIs to be just too slow to be fun; while there are some slowdown points on the Foleo, it’s mostly very responsive, and we’ve spent a lot of our effort on that.
August 13th, 2007 at 1:53 pm
Ben, glad you stopped by. They should make you marketing director as well as tech guy! It’s a good point that I hadn’t really thought about - there could be a ground swell of linux enthusiasts, god knows that they’ve wanted a reasonable device for a long time, something no one’s really been able to provide. Could be the push needed to get chickens and eggs going. :)
As for not going with X and GTK, I’ll definitely agree that that was a wise, wise decision.
August 23rd, 2007 at 9:23 am
[...] point of this that fancy syncing that this is supposed to do? Like that’s the selling point (if there’s a selling point at all)? How do you discover that it doesn’t sync with any phones until the week of launch? I [...]
August 23rd, 2007 at 4:07 pm
[...] seen anything vaguely resembly PR come from any Palm source except for what I’ve seen Ben Combee doing. Which is exactly (amongst other things) what Palm needs to be promoting. They need to turn [...]
November 24th, 2008 at 11:27 am
[...] I know I recycled this Britney joke, but damn if that wasn’t my favourite title ever) ↑ Breakfast Links: [...]