UPDATE: Ben Combee writes in to drop the word that Barron’s was an oversimplified version of the truth. The sync problem seems to be intermittent and crops up only over time under a lot of email load - discovered over the past 6 months during stress testing. Read Ben’s comments for more. This is another story that apparently not news worthy for the official palm blog - seriously, they should just hire Ben to be their PR guy.

UPDATE 2: Ed Colligan responds to Engadget’s open letter. Nothing happens.

There’s been a lot of Palm bashing going on these days, but can you blame? It’s like shooting fish in a barrel. Not that I’d shoot fish in a barrel, but it’s that easy. The latest is the delay on the Foleo - should have launched like now but will be delayed till September/October. I first read it on engadget. I don’t really have much to add, search for “Foleo Delayed” to get what I would have said. But I just wanted to highlight something I thought was odd - this quote from the original Barron’s piece:

The product was supposed to hit Palm stores this week, but was delayed when software bugs were detected. These apparently included an inability to synchronize the Foleo with most models of the Treo, in particular the nominally high-volume Treo 680.

Um… isn’t the whole point of this that fancy syncing that this is supposed to do? Like that’s the selling point (if there’s a selling point at all)? How do you discover that it doesn’t sync with any phones until the week of launch? I suspect it’s things like this that make the 700 fiasco possible…

I mean, I don’t know what from what, but if the quote above is true, that’s really, really sad.

← newer HBO  ↑  Breakfast Links: GenCon, Isotown & Ebay older →

TwitterCounter for @nybble73