<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Chuck and Heroes, Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/02/review-chuck-and-heroes-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/02/review-chuck-and-heroes-part-ii/</link>
	<description>escape colon w q</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: TV roundup</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/02/review-chuck-and-heroes-part-ii/#comment-6645</link>
		<dc:creator>TV roundup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 15:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/02/review-chuck-and-heroes-part-ii/#comment-6645</guid>
		<description>[...] I was going to write a larger post on how disappointed I am in Heroes. Mostly, the same as my last review of Heroes but I&#8217;m annoyed enough to write it again. Then I read sfsignal&#8217;s review of season 2 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I was going to write a larger post on how disappointed I am in Heroes. Mostly, the same as my last review of Heroes but I&#8217;m annoyed enough to write it again. Then I read sfsignal&#8217;s review of season 2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: felix</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/02/review-chuck-and-heroes-part-ii/#comment-6125</link>
		<dc:creator>felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 21:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/02/review-chuck-and-heroes-part-ii/#comment-6125</guid>
		<description>Anyone remember those old marvel comics that were basically catalogues of super folks? There was a parody one that marvel put out with such wondrous folks as "Arm hair grow long lad". Nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone remember those old marvel comics that were basically catalogues of super folks? There was a parody one that marvel put out with such wondrous folks as &#8220;Arm hair grow long lad&#8221;. Nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: howie</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/02/review-chuck-and-heroes-part-ii/#comment-6123</link>
		<dc:creator>howie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 21:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/02/review-chuck-and-heroes-part-ii/#comment-6123</guid>
		<description>nathan has added a new heretofore unseen power involving rapid and intense facial hair growth.

i hope that plays an important role.  kind of like when the tick grew a mustache.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nathan has added a new heretofore unseen power involving rapid and intense facial hair growth.</p>
<p>i hope that plays an important role.  kind of like when the tick grew a mustache.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: felix</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/02/review-chuck-and-heroes-part-ii/#comment-6111</link>
		<dc:creator>felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/02/review-chuck-and-heroes-part-ii/#comment-6111</guid>
		<description>Oh, I wonder what Nathan's thing is going to turn out to be. But is it odd that the two storylines that piqued you were the ones that got the least airtime? Heh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I wonder what Nathan&#8217;s thing is going to turn out to be. But is it odd that the two storylines that piqued you were the ones that got the least airtime? Heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: felix</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/02/review-chuck-and-heroes-part-ii/#comment-6110</link>
		<dc:creator>felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/02/review-chuck-and-heroes-part-ii/#comment-6110</guid>
		<description>You raise a good point! I really liked Ando in these episodes, even though he's only had really minor parts. I still can't believe they killed Sulu, but maybe somehow he isn't dead. Somehow, I get the sense that Mama Petrelli is kinda faking it and she's the mastermind.

But I'm with you. Disappointed. Sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You raise a good point! I really liked Ando in these episodes, even though he&#8217;s only had really minor parts. I still can&#8217;t believe they killed Sulu, but maybe somehow he isn&#8217;t dead. Somehow, I get the sense that Mama Petrelli is kinda faking it and she&#8217;s the mastermind.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m with you. Disappointed. Sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clem</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/02/review-chuck-and-heroes-part-ii/#comment-6102</link>
		<dc:creator>Clem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 01:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/02/review-chuck-and-heroes-part-ii/#comment-6102</guid>
		<description>The Hiro story is SO awful, disappointing, and boring I don't know what else to say. The Claire story is predictable, like you said. The Peter Petrelli story is lame but I like his character and his powers make him quite intriguing. Suresh is OK if a little ho-hum, Parkman is OK...am I leaving anyone out? Oh, Nathan is probably the most intriguing one so far just because he only appears for a few moments in each episode and he really hasn't done anything yet except sulk around in his coat and you just know he's going to have his day. I also like the Ando character, Hiro's buddy. Overall, quite disappointed with the first two episodes so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Hiro story is SO awful, disappointing, and boring I don&#8217;t know what else to say. The Claire story is predictable, like you said. The Peter Petrelli story is lame but I like his character and his powers make him quite intriguing. Suresh is OK if a little ho-hum, Parkman is OK&#8230;am I leaving anyone out? Oh, Nathan is probably the most intriguing one so far just because he only appears for a few moments in each episode and he really hasn&#8217;t done anything yet except sulk around in his coat and you just know he&#8217;s going to have his day. I also like the Ando character, Hiro&#8217;s buddy. Overall, quite disappointed with the first two episodes so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: felix</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/02/review-chuck-and-heroes-part-ii/#comment-6093</link>
		<dc:creator>felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/02/review-chuck-and-heroes-part-ii/#comment-6093</guid>
		<description>All I'm saying is that Lost (season 1), Buffy and even Angel had much tighter scripts than any of this.

And don't mock my tiny brain. It makes me special.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I&#8217;m saying is that Lost (season 1), Buffy and even Angel had much tighter scripts than any of this.</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t mock my tiny brain. It makes me special.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: howie</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/02/review-chuck-and-heroes-part-ii/#comment-6092</link>
		<dc:creator>howie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/02/review-chuck-and-heroes-part-ii/#comment-6092</guid>
		<description>ill have to disagree with felix and his tiny brain on some of this stuff, about heroes anyway.  while his points are valid, we are talking about NBC primetime pop-scifi.  the weak plots and obvious oversights are to be expected.  its fun and the characters are engaging even if annoying at times.  As long as someone ends up wearing a cape this season, im a satisfied viewer.

Jake 2.1, i mean Chuck, just plain sucked.  Journeyman however, shoes some promise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ill have to disagree with felix and his tiny brain on some of this stuff, about heroes anyway.  while his points are valid, we are talking about NBC primetime pop-scifi.  the weak plots and obvious oversights are to be expected.  its fun and the characters are engaging even if annoying at times.  As long as someone ends up wearing a cape this season, im a satisfied viewer.</p>
<p>Jake 2.1, i mean Chuck, just plain sucked.  Journeyman however, shoes some promise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
