In a report that should surprise no one, NPD Group just released a report that lots and lots of iPhone buyers were once Treo (I remember that great day when I dumped my treo for an iPhone) or Sidekick owners (via). Blackberry’s doing just fine. I got my ratio’s inverted when I was thinking about this - I thought that far more Sidekick owners would switch and the Palm flood slightly less, but I guess given the price, Treo users are used to paying more for phones. I suspect that many Treo users were also fed up to here (and here is very high) with Palm’s antics and dieing for something better. I know I was.

Here’s the money quotes:

Initial iPhone buyers were 10 times more likely than other new phone buyers to have previously owned a Treo and three times more likely to have owned a T-Mobile branded phone, such as the popular Sidekick model.

iPhone buyers were no more likely than the average buyer to have previously owned a Blackberry.

So the Treo number is pretty firm in their minds, but it’s actually not easy to say that there’s been a flood of Sidekickers leaving. I suspect that Sidekicks are standing firm for a couple reasons, one is price and two is that they are simply better at text messaging. The iPhone’s hobbled SMS utility is a show stopper for the hardcore texting set - for which the sidekick is a favourite. Hopefully, Apple will get off it’s ass and send us an update soon to remedy that.

In other news, check out this Blackfriars’ piece on why EDGE and 3G might not mean as much as is ballyhooed (via /.). Their basic contention is that latency (the time it takes data to get from the server to your phone) is often just as important as bandwidth (the amount data that can get from the server to your phone in a given time). In the latency department EDGE has the edge, but 3G has it in spades for bandwidth which is the marketable number.

It is an interesting piece, but I wish it was less subjective. It would have been much more compelling if he’d done a few timing studies of how long it took to fully render different websites. Or even a theoretical timing based on latency and bandwidth for loading all the bits of various websites. All things being equal, I’d still prefer 3G - enough of the web is big images, big flash files, that I suspect overall even if the latency argument is a factor that things would be quicker.

Sadly, all things are not equal and here in the states, 3G coverage is sparse and as Jobs keeps pointing out (and the report talks about) it eats batteries. So for me, EDGE is fast enough for the most part and the browsing experience is so much better on the iPhone than the Treo that I am not complaining. I would not want any less battery life on my iPhone than it has now, it sometimes barely makes it through the day. Savvy?

← newer Tuesday Tabs  ↑  Breakfast Links: School, School & Dumb older →

TwitterCounter for @nybble73