<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gmail gets IMAP?? What the hell took so long.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/23/google-imap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/23/google-imap/</link>
	<description>escape colon w q</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: felix</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/23/google-imap/#comment-6446</link>
		<dc:creator>felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/23/google-imap/#comment-6446</guid>
		<description>Frank, good point. For those who want Postini and no hassle mail (who doesn't??) GMail is now a real contender. I wonder how many people were waiting for this and how many they lost to Yahoo because they didn't have it. It was a really weird omission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank, good point. For those who want Postini and no hassle mail (who doesn&#8217;t??) GMail is now a real contender. I wonder how many people were waiting for this and how many they lost to Yahoo because they didn&#8217;t have it. It was a really weird omission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrankM</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/23/google-imap/#comment-6445</link>
		<dc:creator>FrankM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/23/google-imap/#comment-6445</guid>
		<description>I feel this is a much faster move to integrate Google Apps into existing mail platforms. Without spending resources to update Gmail with AJAX features to simulate and work like what the end users are already using, they push right to the top with functionality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel this is a much faster move to integrate Google Apps into existing mail platforms. Without spending resources to update Gmail with AJAX features to simulate and work like what the end users are already using, they push right to the top with functionality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
