<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s enduring love</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/24/googles-enduring-love/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/24/googles-enduring-love/</link>
	<description>escape colon w q</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: PageRank, worth it or not?</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/24/googles-enduring-love/#comment-7072</link>
		<dc:creator>PageRank, worth it or not?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/24/googles-enduring-love/#comment-7072</guid>
		<description>[...] the recent Google PageRank craziness the internet is all twisted panties about what to do. Personally, I&#8217;m on board with this guy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the recent Google PageRank craziness the internet is all twisted panties about what to do. Personally, I&#8217;m on board with this guy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: felix</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/24/googles-enduring-love/#comment-6473</link>
		<dc:creator>felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/24/googles-enduring-love/#comment-6473</guid>
		<description>All of which is not to say that I think PR is accurate or an indicator of anything. I have no idea, but I'm presuming it has some value and effect since all the SEO guys use it as a metric. Those guys make their livings dealing with the engines, so if it was a pure fiction, I doubt as many bits would be devoted to figuring it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of which is not to say that I think PR is accurate or an indicator of anything. I have no idea, but I&#8217;m presuming it has some value and effect since all the SEO guys use it as a metric. Those guys make their livings dealing with the engines, so if it was a pure fiction, I doubt as many bits would be devoted to figuring it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: felix</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/24/googles-enduring-love/#comment-6472</link>
		<dc:creator>felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/24/googles-enduring-love/#comment-6472</guid>
		<description>Eh. He doesn't actually make the case that PR is dead. He makes that case that it would be hard for Google to show you your contextual PR. But, even as that may be, one could assume that the PR Google does present you is your generally best PR for the topics you represent. Nebulous yes, but understandable and reasonable as well. I don't know if that's what it is, but neither does Scoble.

Beyond that he contradicts himself. First he says that PR is keyword sensitive and that it changes from search to search. Then he says that he shows up for searches that are not relevant to him, which would seem to indicate to me that his PR is uniformly high. Which is it? If it was as he said at the top of the piece, he would mainly show up for tech and geek stuff as he wants to.

Also, I deserve all the traffic I get. Dammit. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh. He doesn&#8217;t actually make the case that PR is dead. He makes that case that it would be hard for Google to show you your contextual PR. But, even as that may be, one could assume that the PR Google does present you is your generally best PR for the topics you represent. Nebulous yes, but understandable and reasonable as well. I don&#8217;t know if that&#8217;s what it is, but neither does Scoble.</p>
<p>Beyond that he contradicts himself. First he says that PR is keyword sensitive and that it changes from search to search. Then he says that he shows up for searches that are not relevant to him, which would seem to indicate to me that his PR is uniformly high. Which is it? If it was as he said at the top of the piece, he would mainly show up for tech and geek stuff as he wants to.</p>
<p>Also, I deserve all the traffic I get. Dammit. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kirkunit</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/24/googles-enduring-love/#comment-6471</link>
		<dc:creator>kirkunit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/24/googles-enduring-love/#comment-6471</guid>
		<description>I was going to write something about this, but Scoble says everything I was going to say, but provides actual examples and evidence and whatnot:

http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/24/google-page-rank-is-dead-and-has-been-for-quite-some-time/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to write something about this, but Scoble says everything I was going to say, but provides actual examples and evidence and whatnot:</p>
<p><a href="http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/24/google-page-rank-is-dead-and-has-been-for-quite-some-time/" rel="nofollow">http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/24/google-page-rank-is-dead-and-has-been-for-quite-some-time/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: felix</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/24/googles-enduring-love/#comment-6470</link>
		<dc:creator>felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 02:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/24/googles-enduring-love/#comment-6470</guid>
		<description>PR6! Yeesh. A lofty, lofty group you're in. I can only aspire. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PR6! Yeesh. A lofty, lofty group you&#8217;re in. I can only aspire. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/24/googles-enduring-love/#comment-6465</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 01:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2007/10/24/googles-enduring-love/#comment-6465</guid>
		<description>hey all u illustrious readers, if you wanna see a SIX site, head over to http://www.oracleopensource.com...

PS: I accidentally typed http://deasil.comments.com.  Check it out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey all u illustrious readers, if you wanna see a SIX site, head over to <a href="http://www.oracleopensource.com.." rel="nofollow">http://www.oracleopensource.com..</a>.</p>
<p>PS: I accidentally typed <a href="http://deasil.comments.com" rel="nofollow">http://deasil.comments.com</a>.  Check it out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
