Myspace v. Facebook
Just read some analysis on the latest Hitwise traffic trends for social networking sites (thank god they have not succumbed to the newly blogger blessed “social graph”). Here’s the big reveal:

So you can see that MySpace still owns 72% of the traffic compared to Facebook’s 16%. From this Mr. Kirkpatrick argues that Facebook is getting way too much hype and that MySpace is where everyone actually is. He offers a possible reason that it’s a classist thing where people go to Facebook because they think everyone’s into it as way to get into yuppie pocket books.
I find all this analysis strange. For me, I think this Facebook mania really came into its own last year when it opened it’s API - its previous changes, opening up to high schoolers and then everyone, was just the warm up. So, it’s had less than a year of ramping up time - and in that span it’s grown 50% and that’s real growth from a respectably sized user base, not growth from a tiny user base. It’s building momentum and while it’s had some privacy setbacks, I suspect the outcry was larger than the actual offended user base would have suggested.
MySpace, on the other hand, is on a downward spiral. The AOL of social networks - it’s huge and as such remains a force. Nevertheless, in a time where social networking as a whole is growing and gathering steam it’s losing steam - that’s not a good sign. I think part of the reason for this is while Facebook being run by a 23 year old is problematic in that he’s a bit of a cocky douchebag, in fact he understands social networking much more intuitively than say, Rupert Murdoch. He may not understand why people don’t want him to make tons of money off of their privacy, but he does get what makes social networks work.
He then cites his discovery that Microsoft is sponsoring every music player on the site with Zune. He suspects that it’s causing more Zunes to be sold than ever and can’t find any reporting on the deal. On one hand he’s right, it’s surprising that no one is talking about it, but on the other hand, going by Amazon’s bestseller list where the first and only Zune you come across is at #24, perhaps it is a counterpoint to what he’s trying to say.
He also suggests that the excitement about Facebook is “grounded in the perception that it’s the Junior LinkedIn - the path to yuppie pockets.” I’m not sure what he’s getting at. That me and my friends have joined Facebook not to connect with each other, but actually to get at each other’s money? Or that developers are there and not at MySpace not because, well you can’t actually develop anything for MySpace yet, but because they’re trying to *gasp* make money??
Lastly he plays the race card by wondering how often the press pays attention to blackplanet. Well… how often does the press pay attention to club penguin or gaiaonline or myyearbook? The class and the race conclusion to this piece are huge stretches of imagination, as far as I can see.
TechCrunch offers a differing view as well, they base their views on a ComScore’s view of traffic - which paints a much closer horse race between the two networks. As far as I know, and I could be wrong, ComScore uses panel sampling to get at its data where HitWise uses network gathering partnering with as many ISP’s as it can get its hands on. I’m more inclined to trust HitWise’s numbers than ComScore’s, but there you go.
I think it’s clear that Facebook’s star is rising and MySpace’s is falling and that all the coverage around Facebook is happening not because of some classist prejudice but because Facebook is actually doing and trying new things (for better of for worse) or that 3rd parties are doing and trying new things on Facebook and MySpace isn’t changing much at all. The few times MySpace launches a new product or section - it gets duly covered, it just doesn’t happen very frequently, whereas something is happening on Facebook all the time. Even when it isn’t about Facebook, it’s about Hasbro stupidly cease and desisting some of the most popular apps on the site.








January 17th, 2008 at 11:12 pm
RIP Friendster. R. I. P.
January 18th, 2008 at 7:25 am
Heh, I totally forgot about them! I guess the rest of the internet did, too. Now get on Facebook so I can add you to my other 3 friends.
January 18th, 2008 at 12:04 pm
Maria Basketball has more virtual friends than you.
January 18th, 2008 at 1:33 pm
More friends than me, too.
January 20th, 2008 at 7:19 am
I think his comments on “path to yuppie pockets” refers to how corporate entities jumped on the Facebook bandwagon following the release of th APIs because (and Facebook encourages this) now they can target Facebook’s user base. APIs are interesting to developers like you and me, but they are not a new concept and Facebook wasn’t the first to provide a way to build widgets that others can use (Konfabulator, Google Gadgets, etc.). What was different is that Facebook gives a more direct avenue to the users and what I saw is that it was corporations that really made the API a big news.
MySpace is more of an web site trying to make money selling ads to the eye balls. Facebook is trying to become a marketplace where the product they are selling to corporations is their users and vice versa.
It will be interesting to see whether Open Social will level the playing field because it can lower the technical barrier for players such as MySpace to enable their site to be a “platform” for third party development.
January 20th, 2008 at 10:32 am
Hey, Hsin! I think we mostly agree on things. :) That is, of course I know that Facebook invented neither API’s nor widgets/gadgets - but what they did do is combine API’s, widgets and their userbase into a new delicious whole, and that was revolutionary for the industry.
And corporations loved it because it gave easy access to do interesting things (and market in interesting ways) a sizeable userbase - regardless of class. MySpace was a lone tower - the only options corporations had to access their userbase was, more or less ads/sponsorships - which is only so exciting. I am more than sure that marketers would love nothing more than deeper access to a more youthful userbase as well as the older one facebook allows - the truth is at this point they simply don’t.
I’m definitely interested in seeing how Open Social plays out. I have my own reservations about it’s chances, but we’ll see what happens. I would love it to be really successful! I love nothing more than some real competition in the world!
February 2nd, 2008 at 8:50 am
[...] 8) Myspace v. Facebook [...]