<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Airplane on a Conveyor Belt. ARGH!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comments.deasil.com/2008/02/06/airplane-on-a-conveyor-belt-argh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2008/02/06/airplane-on-a-conveyor-belt-argh/</link>
	<description>escape colon w q</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: felix</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2008/02/06/airplane-on-a-conveyor-belt-argh/#comment-9318</link>
		<dc:creator>felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 15:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2008/02/06/airplane-on-a-conveyor-belt-argh/#comment-9318</guid>
		<description>It depends...do you consider the TCBY as part of the food court? Or an autonomous unit for mid-mall snacking? I'm pretty sure it could get to a big enough food court...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It depends&#8230;do you consider the TCBY as part of the food court? Or an autonomous unit for mid-mall snacking? I&#8217;m pretty sure it could get to a big enough food court&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: howie</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2008/02/06/airplane-on-a-conveyor-belt-argh/#comment-9317</link>
		<dc:creator>howie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 15:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2008/02/06/airplane-on-a-conveyor-belt-argh/#comment-9317</guid>
		<description>But if you put a plane on an escalator, could it still get to the TCBY on the second floor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But if you put a plane on an escalator, could it still get to the TCBY on the second floor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: felix</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2008/02/06/airplane-on-a-conveyor-belt-argh/#comment-9312</link>
		<dc:creator>felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 13:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2008/02/06/airplane-on-a-conveyor-belt-argh/#comment-9312</guid>
		<description>Oh, there's a spirit of the myth alright. If the spirit of the myth was what they tested the myth would have been "If you put a plane on a conveyor belt, would it go forward?" Although, your rollerskate one's a good way of putting it. I'm just saying... it's a stupid myth to bust, what they did.

Maybe Poyla's right - they're running out of myths.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, there&#8217;s a spirit of the myth alright. If the spirit of the myth was what they tested the myth would have been &#8220;If you put a plane on a conveyor belt, would it go forward?&#8221; Although, your rollerskate one&#8217;s a good way of putting it. I&#8217;m just saying&#8230; it&#8217;s a stupid myth to bust, what they did.</p>
<p>Maybe Poyla&#8217;s right - they&#8217;re running out of myths.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robb</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2008/02/06/airplane-on-a-conveyor-belt-argh/#comment-9311</link>
		<dc:creator>robb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2008/02/06/airplane-on-a-conveyor-belt-argh/#comment-9311</guid>
		<description>they did it as right as they could.  i don't think that ther is a spirit of the myth... the first time I heard this all I could think was that the conveyer wouldn't move until the plane moved, but the problem said that the conveyor would keep the plane still.  That can't happen!  So one the plane moved, the conbeyor would have to instantly snap to moving at an infinite speed (or however fast it would be before the bearings on the wheels burnt out.)

Kirk is right:  this is either a question about a guy on rollerskates on a treadmill pulling on a rope OR a question about a plane tied to a rock. but it can't be both.  The conveyor belt is just someone who doesn't understand how the physical world works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they did it as right as they could.  i don&#8217;t think that ther is a spirit of the myth&#8230; the first time I heard this all I could think was that the conveyer wouldn&#8217;t move until the plane moved, but the problem said that the conveyor would keep the plane still.  That can&#8217;t happen!  So one the plane moved, the conbeyor would have to instantly snap to moving at an infinite speed (or however fast it would be before the bearings on the wheels burnt out.)</p>
<p>Kirk is right:  this is either a question about a guy on rollerskates on a treadmill pulling on a rope OR a question about a plane tied to a rock. but it can&#8217;t be both.  The conveyor belt is just someone who doesn&#8217;t understand how the physical world works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poyla</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2008/02/06/airplane-on-a-conveyor-belt-argh/#comment-9289</link>
		<dc:creator>Poyla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 04:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2008/02/06/airplane-on-a-conveyor-belt-argh/#comment-9289</guid>
		<description>After years of this show they are probably running out of testable ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After years of this show they are probably running out of testable ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: felix</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2008/02/06/airplane-on-a-conveyor-belt-argh/#comment-9284</link>
		<dc:creator>felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 04:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2008/02/06/airplane-on-a-conveyor-belt-argh/#comment-9284</guid>
		<description>That is more or less the notion I had for the test. It just underscores the stupidity of the myth. I mean it was just a lame test and if they couldn't do it right they should have done something else. Know? Sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is more or less the notion I had for the test. It just underscores the stupidity of the myth. I mean it was just a lame test and if they couldn&#8217;t do it right they should have done something else. Know? Sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk Unit</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2008/02/06/airplane-on-a-conveyor-belt-argh/#comment-9283</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk Unit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 02:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2008/02/06/airplane-on-a-conveyor-belt-argh/#comment-9283</guid>
		<description>I think the point is that the conveyor belt can't create the presumed conditions of the test. The "spirit of the myth" is, in fact, not physically possible. It's an engineering question that can't escape some basic mechanics.

Let's chain a plane to a big enough rock to defeat the thrust provided by the engine, and well, now we're talking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the point is that the conveyor belt can&#8217;t create the presumed conditions of the test. The &#8220;spirit of the myth&#8221; is, in fact, not physically possible. It&#8217;s an engineering question that can&#8217;t escape some basic mechanics.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s chain a plane to a big enough rock to defeat the thrust provided by the engine, and well, now we&#8217;re talking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
