<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Analytics Benchmarks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comments.deasil.com/2008/03/24/google-analytics-benchmarks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2008/03/24/google-analytics-benchmarks/</link>
	<description>escape colon w q</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 06:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: felix</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2008/03/24/google-analytics-benchmarks/#comment-10398</link>
		<dc:creator>felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2008/03/24/google-analytics-benchmarks/#comment-10398</guid>
		<description>Jason, yeah, if the numbers are interesting I can't think of a good reason not to sign up - as of now I don't see the privacy/competitive concerns. I'd definitely be curious to see if your 900 sites also show the PV bucketing behaviour or if that was just coincidence for me. Man that'd be cool if G would let you switch bucketing metrics so you could say - of all the sites that have bouncerates like mine, what are the other stats. That'd be sweet.

And the interpretation you provide is a good one - consistent with searchers' behaviours, but I'd like to make the site stickier, so that people come and say, that was a neat piece, what else is up in here? Let me subscribe to the RSS. And let me click on a few of these ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason, yeah, if the numbers are interesting I can&#8217;t think of a good reason not to sign up - as of now I don&#8217;t see the privacy/competitive concerns. I&#8217;d definitely be curious to see if your 900 sites also show the PV bucketing behaviour or if that was just coincidence for me. Man that&#8217;d be cool if G would let you switch bucketing metrics so you could say - of all the sites that have bouncerates like mine, what are the other stats. That&#8217;d be sweet.</p>
<p>And the interpretation you provide is a good one - consistent with searchers&#8217; behaviours, but I&#8217;d like to make the site stickier, so that people come and say, that was a neat piece, what else is up in here? Let me subscribe to the RSS. And let me click on a few of these ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Das</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2008/03/24/google-analytics-benchmarks/#comment-10397</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Das</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/2008/03/24/google-analytics-benchmarks/#comment-10397</guid>
		<description>I haven't opted into benchmarks for any of my 900 sites (or maybe I did and forgot about it), but reading this makes me want to.

Less page views and more bounces could mean you're doing a great job, if it means you're putting what people want on the page they land on, and they don't have to click a bunch of extra times to get there. (The opposite would be something like MySpace, where you have to click through 10 pages to get to what should have happened in one or two.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t opted into benchmarks for any of my 900 sites (or maybe I did and forgot about it), but reading this makes me want to.</p>
<p>Less page views and more bounces could mean you&#8217;re doing a great job, if it means you&#8217;re putting what people want on the page they land on, and they don&#8217;t have to click a bunch of extra times to get there. (The opposite would be something like MySpace, where you have to click through 10 pages to get to what should have happened in one or two.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
