<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why is the internet so extreme? or No, your language is not dead.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comments.deasil.com/2008/06/05/why-is-the-internet-so-extreme-or-no-your-language-is-not-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2008/06/05/why-is-the-internet-so-extreme-or-no-your-language-is-not-dead/</link>
	<description>escape colon w q</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 04:30:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Some more thoughts on Chrome and Firefox</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2008/06/05/why-is-the-internet-so-extreme-or-no-your-language-is-not-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-14383</link>
		<dc:creator>Some more thoughts on Chrome and Firefox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/?p=1652#comment-14383</guid>
		<description>[...] piece on how Firefox may already be dead and thought to myself that I would ignore it as the inevitable stupidity of the internets. Then I read Dave Winer&#8217;s response to that piece and while I typically dislike what he has to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] piece on how Firefox may already be dead and thought to myself that I would ignore it as the inevitable stupidity of the internets. Then I read Dave Winer&#8217;s response to that piece and while I typically dislike what he has to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why does everything have to be an operating system?</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2008/06/05/why-is-the-internet-so-extreme-or-no-your-language-is-not-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-12825</link>
		<dc:creator>Why does everything have to be an operating system?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/?p=1652#comment-12825</guid>
		<description>[...] meaning, language evolves after all. My beef with all this is the inflation of the internets. The web, seemingly, has to keep one-upping itself, everything has to be revolutionary or idiotic. It&#8217;s not just enough for a website to be a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] meaning, language evolves after all. My beef with all this is the inflation of the internets. The web, seemingly, has to keep one-upping itself, everything has to be revolutionary or idiotic. It&#8217;s not just enough for a website to be a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter, worth a billion? nothing? too late? no, no &#38; no.</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2008/06/05/why-is-the-internet-so-extreme-or-no-your-language-is-not-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-11225</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter, worth a billion? nothing? too late? no, no &#38; no.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 14:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/?p=1652#comment-11225</guid>
		<description>[...] I try not to add too much to the twitter whinging (was that too british of me?), but I thought I&#8217;d give this a roll. It all, pretty much confirms my generalized notion that there is no middle ground on the web. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I try not to add too much to the twitter whinging (was that too british of me?), but I thought I&#8217;d give this a roll. It all, pretty much confirms my generalized notion that there is no middle ground on the web. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: felix</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2008/06/05/why-is-the-internet-so-extreme-or-no-your-language-is-not-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-15542</link>
		<dc:creator>felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/?p=1652#comment-15542</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Ruby definitely has the momentum now, although it seems to be quieting down. Python&#039;s always had a little momentum, with a big backer like Google it&#039;s hard not to. But definitely, it just isn&#039;t hard to increase a tiny userbase - although, Apple like, it does seem to be a very high quality small userbase. Huh, Ruby/Python : Apple - PHP : Dell? Heh.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I like to think, though, that it was PHP that provided the general acceptance of dynamic languages. Unfettered by Perl&#039;s unfortunate tie (in people&#039;s minds) with the slowness of CGI scripting everyone started using it. I think what Ruby and Python are doing are giving it more of an academic flavor so that even snobby folk can finally be ok with it. :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree with you re: Perl 6. In many ways, though, I&#039;m more excited for Parrot. Seeing the performance improvement that SquirrelFish brought to javascript by moving to (amongst other things) a register based VM makes me think that the world would not be bad off with a general register based vm for all dynamic languages. An Apache mod_parrot could be a powerful thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Ruby definitely has the momentum now, although it seems to be quieting down. Python&#39;s always had a little momentum, with a big backer like Google it&#39;s hard not to. But definitely, it just isn&#39;t hard to increase a tiny userbase &#8211; although, Apple like, it does seem to be a very high quality small userbase. Huh, Ruby/Python : Apple &#8211; PHP : Dell? Heh.</p>
<p>I like to think, though, that it was PHP that provided the general acceptance of dynamic languages. Unfettered by Perl&#39;s unfortunate tie (in people&#39;s minds) with the slowness of CGI scripting everyone started using it. I think what Ruby and Python are doing are giving it more of an academic flavor so that even snobby folk can finally be ok with it. :)</p>
<p>I agree with you re: Perl 6. In many ways, though, I&#39;m more excited for Parrot. Seeing the performance improvement that SquirrelFish brought to javascript by moving to (amongst other things) a register based VM makes me think that the world would not be bad off with a general register based vm for all dynamic languages. An Apache mod_parrot could be a powerful thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mpodrazik</title>
		<link>http://comments.deasil.com/2008/06/05/why-is-the-internet-so-extreme-or-no-your-language-is-not-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-15543</link>
		<dc:creator>mpodrazik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 07:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comments.deasil.com/?p=1652#comment-15543</guid>
		<description>Perl is totally dead, so is JavaScript:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.symbiont.net/2008/06/javascript-is-dead-long-live-javascript.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blog.symbiont.net/2008/06/javascript-is-...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Seriously though, I agree with you about the hype factor surrounding languages like Ruby. I think though that another contributing factor beyond general extremeness is growth rate. If you look at the job trends at &lt;a href=&quot;http://indeed.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;indeed.com&lt;/a&gt; for an arbitrary selection of languages, (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=c%252Cjava%252Cc%252B%252B%252Cc%2523%252Cperl%252Cphp%252Cpython%252Cruby&amp;l=&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=c%2Cjava%2Cc%...&lt;/a&gt;), it shows perl beating out other dynamic languages like php, python and ruby, (although still behind c, java, c++ and c#).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you check the relative scale though, (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=c%252Cjava%252Cc%252B%252B%252Cc%2523%252Cperl%252Cphp%252Cpython%252Cruby&amp;l=&amp;relative=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=c%2Cjava%2Cc%...&lt;/a&gt;), ruby is just off the chart. Yeah, you can say that because it&#039;s mindshare/marketshare is so small that it&#039;s easy for it to rack up big growth rates, and you&#039;d be right, but big moves like that that are new are the definition of news, and that in turn feeds the blogs and the general zeitgeist.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ruby hyperbole I think is on its way out. What is good though, I think, is a general acceptance of dynamic languages, and maybe more than that but a breaking down of peoples&#039; inhibitions about language proliferation in general. That can only be good for something like perl once 6 is official, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perl is totally dead, so is JavaScript:<br /><a href="http://blog.symbiont.net/2008/06/javascript-is-dead-long-live-javascript.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://blog.symbiont.net/2008/06/javascript-is-.." rel="nofollow">http://blog.symbiont.net/2008/06/javascript-is-..</a>.</p>
<p>Seriously though, I agree with you about the hype factor surrounding languages like Ruby. I think though that another contributing factor beyond general extremeness is growth rate. If you look at the job trends at <a href="http://indeed.com" rel="nofollow">indeed.com</a> for an arbitrary selection of languages, (<a href="http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=c%252Cjava%252Cc%252B%252B%252Cc%2523%252Cperl%252Cphp%252Cpython%252Cruby&#038;l=" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=c%2Cjava%2Cc%.." rel="nofollow">http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=c%2Cjava%2Cc%..</a>.), it shows perl beating out other dynamic languages like php, python and ruby, (although still behind c, java, c++ and c#).</p>
<p>If you check the relative scale though, (<a href="http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=c%252Cjava%252Cc%252B%252B%252Cc%2523%252Cperl%252Cphp%252Cpython%252Cruby&#038;l=&#038;relative=1" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=c%2Cjava%2Cc%.." rel="nofollow">http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=c%2Cjava%2Cc%..</a>.), ruby is just off the chart. Yeah, you can say that because it&#39;s mindshare/marketshare is so small that it&#39;s easy for it to rack up big growth rates, and you&#39;d be right, but big moves like that that are new are the definition of news, and that in turn feeds the blogs and the general zeitgeist.</p>
<p>The ruby hyperbole I think is on its way out. What is good though, I think, is a general acceptance of dynamic languages, and maybe more than that but a breaking down of peoples&#39; inhibitions about language proliferation in general. That can only be good for something like perl once 6 is official, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

