I like Chrome, but it really isn’t the Jesus Browser

So I like Chrome, I think it has the potential to be a really great browser. Beyond that, I like that Google seems to be drawing a line in the sand for this project, something it’s not done in a long, long time. They didn’t announce it two years ago, they didn’t start a consortium of 23 of their best friends to ally with each other to figure it out. They just did it and launched it with a lot of press and backing when it was ready to be launched, they’ve hired and acquired the talent to keep at this bad boy and they seem fully intent on doing so.

I think, though, that some folks are a little too over the moon about this browser. A little breathlessly so. I read a lot of talk about how this is a revolutionary step in browsers and Brin himself gives up their aspiration to make this a web OS relagating the OS’s of today as legacy.

In all these arguments, I’ve seen folks compare it with the iPhone. A lot notice that most of what Chrome is getting press for is not new. But like the iPhone, some argue, enough of these evolutionary steps in one place can, in fact, be revolutionary.

Here’s the thing for me. From a user perspective, Chrome simply is not revolutionary. I’m all completely down with hating on the checklist feature mentality. But it does not significantly change the browsing experience for me the way the iPhone changed the smartphone experience. I do things differently on the iPhone than I do on any other smartphone, I use it more, much, much more. And that is the same thing I’ve heard from pretty much every other iPhone owner I’ve talked to.

On the other hand, Chrome doesn’t change the way I browse. Maybe it’s faster than the current crop of production browsers. Maybe the speed increase is noticeable. Maybe it crashes less. The screen is less cluttered and the Omnibar is freaking awesome – more awesome than the Awesomebar. But, it doesn’t change a single thing about the way I browse or what I browse to. Its touted javascript speed when compared, more properly, to the upcoming generation of browsers may not be so stunning.

Probably the most interesting change is turning each tab into a process. A trade-off, from what I’ve read of resource consumption for stability. This is probably the thing that most engenders the web OS chatter, but really, hopefully it’s true and it works (maybe not?). But ok, let’s not get so breathless here. Web servers have run their several of copies of themselves as different processes forever, but no one is calling them a new OS? The point of it all, is robustness, if from a user perspective everything runs well, it won’t matter if it’s different processes or what, so let’s see what everyone comes up with. And on the flip side, thanks to Microsoft (ok, low blow), people are used to their stuff crashing. They live with it, so even increased stability isn’t a huge draw for people. (Which is not at all to say that it isn’t important).

All I’m saying is that Chrome isn’t a huge step forward in browser evolution. It’s important on several levels. To me one of the most interesting thing about it is that Google has deep pockets and a genuine financial incentive to make the web work better and faster – all the other browser vendors are competing with each other for the abstract purpose of making a better browser to convince people to switch to their app. That difference alone gives Chrome a very interesting perspective and very interesting future. And even if it never ends up a mainstream browser its existence as well as its open sourceness will hopefully accelarate, whether by competition or cooperation, what was already an increasingly heated browser war.

But all this talk about how Chrome is this huge revolution and is totally light years ahead of their competition. Well, I just don’t see it. It’s a great browser, no doubt, but just a regular step (ok, a largish step) forward in this latest round of browser wars. I’d argue that projects like Ubiquity (although at a higher level than the browser) offers much more potential to change the web. Where do you fall on this? What am I missing?

  • It's true that chrome is "just" a browser albeit a very good one, potentially the best. But it's ok that it doesn't change your browsing as that is the intention. The potential for chrome is more that i can blur the line between desktop and web apps. The apps that may change your daily habits are still to created. The potential unleashed by the chrome browser is enourmous, so the change such a game changing do arise are very reasonable.
  • Huh, I think it's pretty interesting how cross pollinated (or whatever) this whole browser business is with folks from Mozilla now on Chrome, with John Resig (the jQuery guy) at Mozilla, with Mozilla relying on Google for the bulk of their money but with their rendering coming from Webkit and all this code being free. Kind of neat stuff.
  • I also like that Google hosts versions of jQuery for developers to embed in their own apps. My guess would be that they will contribute (or have already?) optimizations to jQuery that will make it possibly even faster to run in V8.
  • Mike, I agree that I think it's pretty unlikely that Chrome will garner any significant browser share, especially anytime in the next couple years. Although promoting it on their homepage could help boost some numbers. It'd certainly be interesting for Mozilla and Apple to adopt V8, although I am kind of enjoying the js engine battle - with enough compliance testing to ensure compatibility, it may be more beneficial to have a set of competing engines pushing each other on.

    The application shortcuts is a pretty interesting feature - I think I got used to it on my iPhone so I kind of forgot it wasn't so prevalent on the desktop. Coupling that with the distinct processes is definitely a pretty serious feature of Chrome that I haven't really thought enough about. Saved state. Mmmm..... I totally agree that everyone wins as these features creep into the other browsers.

    Omnibar + AwesomeBar + Ubiquity all in one field would indeed be something. I hope they make this happen!
  • I think it's difficult to envision that Google, at least anytime soon, will have Chrome deployed on any large number of computers. It will be difficult to fight their way into the marketplace, especially with a product that on the surface doesn't do much of anything different than Firefox, Safari, and IE. With that in mind, even if they don't win browser share, the idea of building all of this technology and making it open source seems like a strong move for them. Imagine Firefox and Safari adopting V8 as their internal JS engines (for some reason, I doubt that Microsoft would follow this crowd)? Two of the most popular browsers would render JS incredibly fast. That's a win for Google and their application-centric products.

    If Google *does* get market share (through enterprise or university adoption, distribution with Linux OSes, advertising on their own site, Google Pack, etc. *), then they may start to change the minds of many average users -- that the Internet is the platform. One of my favorite features, and it's not widely discussed, is that you can add an "Application Shortcut" to your desktop for various sites. For example, make a shortcut of GMail and put it on your desktop. You get the cute red envelop icon, and clicking it opens GMail in it's own window with a preserved session state. That seems a lot like opening Apple Mail, Outlook Express, Thunderbird, Eudora (!), etc. Same with Google Docs -- nice icon, opens like traditional software. When (average) people start thinking about sites as applications, then Google's "platform" or "OS" will start to win over users from Microsoft Office.

    Again, if Firefox, Safari, and IE add this sort of feature, Google wins.

    Finally, since you mentioned Ubiquity, I've got to say that I love it. It's experimental, so it looks like an add-on right now. I think that's going to change. Think OmniBar + AwesomeBar + Ubiquity all in one field at the top of your browser. Simple to use for average users, but extensible for power users. I can't wait!

    * Granted, most of these sources are where you pick up power-users, not average users.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Not Found

Sorry, but what you are looking for isn't here...