My thoughts on the Palm Pre Smartphone

So yesterday Palm finally announced it’s impending new next gen smartphone (the Pre) and their next gen OS (WebOS). All the details are not available yet, but let’s just say from the demo and some brief hands on people are excited. Palm needed a winner and it looks like it has one – a new hardware/software platform with all the bells and whistles that seems to put it in the running for 2nd place with RIMM and Android. It copies liberally from the iPhone (which is a good thing) but also moves beyond it in very interesting ways.

But really, why the hell did they call this thing “Pre”? I haven’t seen an explanation for the naming yet, but I see in blog titles all over the place (like this post for example) “Pre Smartphone”. Um… so, it’s before smartphones? I can’t understand the rationale. Sigh.

Anyhow there’s a lot to like on this bad boy. It seems to have a good camera (at least a 3MP) one and even a flash on it, which should make it pretty useful in a wide variety of situations. It has multi-tasking and I read that they expect people to have 10-15 apps open at any given time, which is pretty sweet and implies some nice horsepower.

Also, Palm always had a nice vision of UI, I’d say second only to Apple’s. This time, though, they’ve trumped their alma mater (much of the new leadership and engineering comes from the iPhone department) with an app launcher that drops down over your current app instead of being a completely separate app in itself. I imagine this will be sort of like calling up that modal iPod control on an iPhone that doesn’t interrupt the app itself. I love this idea.

The extra gesture area below the screen also is an incredibly great idea that I hope Apple copies in some form. Given that these phones have only a single button (or trackball in the case of the Pre that’s what I get for reading Gizmodo, Ben Combee says it’s just a button in the comments below), adding that gesture area opens up the possibility for more generic commands which the iPhone is sorely, sorely lacking. (Yup, one click and two click isn’t quite good enough).

Synergy (it’s showtime, Synergy!) also seems quite cool – bringing your various boxes (contacts, Facebook and Google) into one unified list (without dups, even!). And where Palm pioneered the threaded SMS convos which everyone has copied, they improve on that with a combined SMS/IM box (with the implied built in support for IM) which sounds fantastic. Of course built in GPS with turn-by-turn is de rigeur. All this in a package about iPhone sized and weight – by volume this thing is about 6 cu inches vs. 5.2 cu inches on the iPhone. And the Touchstone wireless charger, well, that’s just cool.

I do, however, have concerns about this thing as well as more questions. My biggest worry is this Mojo Application Framework. They seem to want to develop applications using web technologies like html, css and javascript. While this is clearly a step up from Apple’s original, “just develop web apps!” since Palm will have them local and provide a framework for access to the interesting bits of the hardware, I still have concern that these aren’t going to be the best tools versus actual native binaries.

Smartphones still don’t have a ton of processor power and javascript isn’t going to be the most efficient way to use that. Nor does it generally give one control to maximize the efficiency of memory use. While Palm seems to have things under control what with them expecting people to have a ton of apps running at the same time, I’m still skeptical that this is a good long term development option, especially for games. Given that they also support Adobe’s flash (at least Dan Lyons says so), I wonder if they will add an Air like option for development as well or if they will eventually release another full native SDK as an additional app option. One or the other has to be coming down the pike.

I also had some unanswered questions – how well does this play with the desktop? Does it have a desktop sync with conduits like the old PalmOS (hopefully!). A really important question is how well does it sync with your desktop music? If you have to drag and drop music over to it that would kill it dead in the water for me – it needs automatic syncing with some nice controls to at least one major desktop media manager. I pray it doesn’t eschew the desktop for the cloud as Android does.

It doesn’t play video (and thus I assume doesn’t take video) which is a surprising omission. (Again, thanks Gizmodo for the misinformation, but really thanks Ben for the correction.) It doesn’t seem to be positioning itself in any way as a media center – more as an online hub, which is at distinct odds with the iPhone. Wonder if it’ll pay off or not.

Anyhow this is a serious contender. I wish they hadn’t felt the need to make it a slider – that hard keyboard must add some serious chunk to the phone and really, most people don’t need it no more and you’ll get all the complaining that people want to type in landscape mode. Still the form factor looks good, the design looks good, the ui looks good. I always knew that Palm had great engineering talent and a good UI sense, they just needed someone with vision at the top. I still firmly believe that Colligan needs desperately to go – they seem to be pricing this more than $200 if you believe this conversation with Ed:

My assumption is that Palm (PALM) would try to take market share by coming in significantly lower than the $200 or so Apple wants for its iPhone. But when I ran that theory by Palm CEO Ed Colligan, he looked at me liked I’d peed on his rug. “Why would we do that when we have a significantly better product,” he asked, then walked away.

Remember when he said that the iPhone wasn’t going to just walk in to the telecoms business that he knew so much about? Yeah. Maybe the Pre is a better phone, but in this economic environment when you’re competing against the iPhone which has all the market momentum you could possibly make and Palm’s coming off years and years of sitting with its thumb up its ass, you need to at least have some respect for the competition.

In the end, I think the Pre looks good. Now they need to ship that SDK sooner rather than later and they need to ship the phone sooner rather than later. I think a long period of time between this announcment and those milestones just serves to dillute the current excitement in the air. Anyhow, I’m excited for this thing to be great. I want it to be great. Everyone benefits the more real competition and real innovation there are in this space. With Android and WebOS nipping at its heels, Apple’s going to need to come up with some Mobile OSX goodness tout suite. You know, say, background processing? What do you think? Is Palm back in the race?

  • Heh - well you know my view on the AppleTV app-store. I too would like a
    Mac app store, and I'm sure they're thinking about it. However I think they
    need to do some work on it while it's still on the iPhone. I'd hate to see
    the Mac become the domain of thousands of $0.99 fart apps!
  • Nothing in particular, although now that I'm thinking about it, some of the small games would be fun to have for a quick diversion, or the things like KICKMap , or some other minor apps that behave a lot like dashboard widgets anyway... I guess the Google Mobile App just got some experimental love for the Mac, which I haven't checked out yet.

    What I really want is simply an App Store for OSX. How awesome would that be, for the desktop, for the iPhone and... dare I say it... for AppleTV. :)
  • Lol, I have no comment on this! I continue to question your sanity, though.
  • Any apps you are thinking of in particular, felix?
  • It's too bad they didn't bring back Graffiti. Keyboard is ok and all but it would've been pretty cool to input using finger Graffiti gestures. ;-p
  • These are great points - I have a longer post brewing on this topic, but my basic thinking is that with the launch of the iPhone essentially came the mainstreaming of the smartphone. The market went from niche to mainstream over the past two years and will is and will continue to grow quickly. Thus, more or less, the market essentially started two years ago - what had gone on prior to that is irrelevant to success in the new market. RIMM had a historical advantage but now they're saddled with a legacy OS ill equipped to meet this new crop of next gen mobile OS's head on, something big is going to need to happen on this front and soon. Android is a real contender - but they are saddled with a consortium of 30 odd partners with conflicting needs, I have a grave fear that the speed of their innovation is going to be hampered by this. Microsoft and Nokia, in my opinion are worse off in this new landscape saddled with both legacy OS's, no impending new ones and as far as I can tell are desperately trying to stay afloat. If WebOS and the Pre come out soon and live up to most of the hype, I think it'll really put Palm back on the map.
  • I hope that WebOS turns out to actually kick ass and it encourages Apple to make some very significant changes to mobile OSX! Conversely, I'd love desktop OSX to be able to run some of my iPhone apps as apps or widgets or something. Obviously input is problematic, but still...
  • wka
    I could see WebOS encouraging Apple to make it possible to run Dashboard-style Javascript/HTML-based quasi-apps on the iPhone. I seem to recall reading some rumors about Dashboard widgets on the iPhone long ago, but they never panned out.
  • Palm is definitely back in the race, but I don't know where that puts them in the multi-year race you posit. The new OS looks sweet, but they are missing a key business advantage that the other players have.

    Apple obviously redefined the market and are the team to beat, especially when combined with their dominant IPod position and ascendant Mac hardware/software. Everybody loves the brand. They are integrated. Nuff said.

    RIM has historically been dominant among business users, the BlackBerry is ubiquitous. This can continue to be leveraged, (the client I'm at, for example, outlaws IPhone access to the corporate Exchange server but BlackBerries are supported). The movement of everybody to more powerful smart phones was inevitable. Their problem is that Apple captured everyone's attention at the critical tipping point with a killer product.

    Android's big, while unproven, selling-point is that it's open source. Google is not the hardware maker and anybody can run the damn thing. They don't need to have these exclusive relationships with carriers since potentially many many handset makers will have it on many many devices on many many carriers. It's the Microsoft strategy vs. the Apple strategy, but with a free Windows license. Regardless of the features this is a very attractive option I would think.

    Don't count out Nokia and Microsoft either. Windows Mobile sucks but it is impossible that Microsoft will allow all this action to go unanswered for long. The whole Azure/Live/Mesh combination could be a force to be reckoned with, and now that Symbian is open source as well who knows.

    Anyway, the Pre appears to be very impressive, but from a one-foot-in-the-grave company exclusively partnered with the distant third-place carrier having their own problems (hemorrhaging customers, me included), its still gonna be tough road for them. They would need a big selling point. Now if they come out with a WiMAX-enabled version...
  • 22209
    I've got an awesome plan that I'd like to keep .. it's the earlier version of the SERO (Sprint Employee Referral Offer(?)). I've got unlimited data, unlimited text, and 500 anytime minutes (nights/weekends start at 7pm) for $30/month. I'm happy using that on my Centro, and can't imagine a phone cool enough to make me pay more than double monthly.
  • Thanks for the corrections, Ben! I had read so much, I was going off a Gizmodo wrap up piece and I guess somehow they just had the wrong info in it. Sigh. I'm disappointed (a tiny bit) about it being a button instead of a trackball, I've had a little jealousy about those blackberry trackballs! But that's great news that it'll play video - will it take video also? That'd be the cat's meow.

    I'm looking forward to seeing this in the flesh. I read that this was a linux based OS, is this related in any way to the OS designed for the Foleo? Or was it a brand new beast? Reasonable to expect, assuming success of the platform, that this might show up on a netbookish like thing? Inquiring minds want to know! :)
  • Yeah, I've got another post brewing about the smartphone market, but I think it's going to be a big 2-3 year race to establish #2 and it's between RIMM, Palm and Android. I'm really not sure at this point who's got the edge... if Palm is able to regain the luster of its brand quickly, I might bank on them, but I suspect it'll be a harder road even with top notch gear. We'll see!

    I'm with you also, I'm sure we'll a major update in hardware and software for the iPhone in a year or so that'll bring them up to speed. I would really not mind seeing a speed bump on the iPhone, a little extra horsepower would go a nice long way. :)
  • I think that's a little more expensive than my iPhone plan, but it does give unlimited minutes and texts also... if that was available on AT&T, I might go for that. What plan would you like to see?
  • 1) the button isn't a trackball, just a shiny button and part of the gesture area

    2) it does play video. In one of the interviews with Ed Colligan that is online, it shows the device playing a movie in landscape mode.

    3) more will be revealed in the time before we launch
  • Nice analysis. Most people I talk to seem to be saying that the best thing about it is the competition it gives to Apple. I've said elsewhere that the people who should be most afraid of this are RIM because migration for their users would be a plain win, whereas iPod/iPhone customers would have to sacrifice games and media. Also it's worth remembering that by the time the Pre comes out, it will be 2 years since apple started selling the iphone, and a year since the last hardware upgrade. We could well be looking a significant iPhone hardware and software rev around that time. I can't believe that Apple don't know that springboard is in need of an overhaul, and we know they are doing 'something' about background operation. Just those two things would eliminate most of the apparent OS advantage of the Pre. They could even legitimately use the card metaphor for app switching since they designed it in the first place for mobile safari. I'd say the single other thing that Apple could do to distance themselves from the pack again would be to double the speed.
  • 22209
    I'm excited about the Pre, but worried that Sprint will require the Simply Everything plan (~$70/month) for its use as they do for the Instinct. I might be willing to pay over $200 one-time for the Pre, but not with a $70 recurring charge.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Not Found

Sorry, but what you are looking for isn't here...