Why I think the Kindle’s already succeeded

Despite that fact that I don’t own a Kindle, I’ve long been a proponent of the e-reader. I think like the iPod it’s created a real market out of a moribund niche that was withering on the vine – perhaps that market is smaller and less vibrant in potential than the music market, but it’s there nevertheless. Everyone I know or who I’ve read got one, even the skeptics, ultimately ends up loving it – even at the strangely expensive price point that Amazon’s got it at.

At this instant – it could be argued that the market still doesn’t fully exist and the whole thing could still easily go down. Amazon has a lot of books out but there’s still a ton that aren’t available – in fact, as I look around for some books I’d like to get on it, they aren’t in the library which is why I don’t have one yet. Also, while the Kindle is a top seller – in absolute numbers, there most likely aren’t too many Kindles out in the world yet. It’s still being built up.

I’m arguing, though, that that’s wrong – that this thing has already arrived and is going to succeed. The market is made and now it’s just taking some time to mature. The reason for this is that I see a lot of competition trying to get started up – and the interesting thing is that this competition is coming not from technology companies, but from publishers and distributors.

The first one happened a bit ago and was Hearst’s statement that they’re working on something. While, I honestly don’t have high hopes for this device, the implication is that Hearst, a huge publisher, sees both a threat and the future in the Kindle and is moving to try and ensure that they have a larger say in that future than simply a client of Amazon’s.

The next one is a more recent rumor, but again one that makes sense. Barnes and Noble seems to be trying to get into the game. Again, B&N isn’t a technology company – they’re a distribution company that sees the business effect of Amazon’s Kindle and how it is going to grow larger in the future taking business away from the current shipping of paper everywhere. They need to do something that simply doesn’t cede the whole market to Amazon.

In both cases, these are businesses that are part of the industry that the Kindle is going to disrupt. They see what’s going on and feel threatened enough to need to build their own competitor to Amazon. Interestingly enough all these devices are taking the same tack that Amazon’s Whispernet pioneered with free wireless connection. These are all attempting to be direct competitors to the Kindle. Hearst’s take is more novel with a goal of a whitebox type device that other publishers can take and brand on their own. B&N’s seems more directly comparable.

In my head I’ve compared and contrasted this to the years long love of the technology company with tablet computing. Here’s a product that no one but tech companies thinks that the world needs and they’ve kept trying to make them over the years. But the market simply refuses to be made – tech companies simply don’t represent consumer needs. The innovation isn’t coming from any company in touch with consumers about what they’re looking for, it’s just something that tech companies would like people to like.

The latest rumor that Apple’s trying to get into this could be the most reasonable entry to tablet computing – with Apple being a very consumer friendly company. Even here, though, I don’t believe a tablet in the sense of a largish screen, general computing device is going to be successful. Nobody wants it, in actuality. But who knows.

Anyhow, I think the admission of Hearst and B&N that the Kindle is getting ready to bust a cap in their industry reveals the writing on the wall. It’s happening boys and girls and I for one am looking forward to it. How much more awesome is it to buy music online, download it immediately and be listening to it in minutes. Sure, I don’t get a liner book any more, sure maybe the quality isn’t quite as good, but for most people, most the time digital is more convenient and easier to work with.

  • I didn't end up getting a kindle - I've been using it on the iPhone. I
    expected it to be unusable regardless of the quality of the software but
    since it was free, I gave it a go and it turns out I was wrong.
    Since the phone is with me during all kinds of 'waiting periods' and a
    kindle would not be, the kindle is of marginal value to me, although if I
    buy more books this way it may well end up being a requisite item for home
    use.

    Yeah - I am not totally convinced about the jumbo ipod tablet yet. What I
    do know is that my MacBook Air is not a good ebook. I have read a few
    long-form pieces on it, and even the iPhone would have been better.

    How much would it actually cost I wonder? $600? Backup to time-capsule,
    etc. It could end up being as good a solution for the grandparents as for
    the always-on generation. Think star-trek rather than tablet-pc. It's
    really all about the software, and it's really only a matter of time. For
    all we know it could still be a year away.

    In any case, I encourage you to try the kindle iPhone app. The experience
    has definitely taught me something.
  • That's cool! Did you end up also getting a Kindle or just reading on the iPhone? Have you don't much long form reading on the iPhone? I think that would melt my brain, but I also have a very delicate brain. :)

    We'll see - I don't doubt that if a table is going to be successful, Apple's going to be the one to build it. I just don't see it happening. I mean a big screen iPod touch would be cool - but it'd be some wierd limbo where you don't have a hard keyboard to play with and it'd be expensive so would you actually get one just so you can surf while you're sitting on a couch? As opposed to picking up a laptop which might be more generally useful? I dunno. As an e-reader, even with a large screen it'd be tough because of weight, battery life and active screen.
  • You should be able to read it while you're sitting on the runway! Just fly Delta and you'll have hours of hanging out on the tarmac. ;) You don't read in the air?

  • David
    I fly twice a week and a lot of my print reading is take off, landing, and sitting on the runway... I would love a kindle for this but sadly... it has an on/off switch and cannot be used.
  • Totally agree about the kindle being successful. I was skeptical before, but even the iPhone app is great. Incidentally you were right about the free intro chapter being enough. It's worked perfectly for me, and I haven't once wanted the $99c per chapter that I suggested back at the time.

    However, I do think there is going to be a market for an Apple tablet device. It has to be a multi-touch device closer in operation to the iPhone than the desktop OS - and that's where i think the opportunity lies. I've owned multiple tablet PCs in the past - actually dating back to Windows for Pen! - all for research purposes at one job or another and yes- they've all been little more than a curiosity, but that's because they were running an OS tailored for office content creation. Mac OS is still mostly tailored for media creation, but the iPhone OS is a player/consumer device, and if the tablet is a large media player where media = games, connected apps, books, video, and websites, then I think they will have a winner.
  • Heh, the publishers probably just don't want to pull a blunder like the music industry did with Apple. At least they have the luxury that the e-book market is much slower moving than music.

    The Nokia's were more akin to the web tablet than a tablet PC. Our IT guy had one and yeah, didn't do much with it after the initial novelty wore off. And I believe my cousin in Taiwan was using one as a web tablet for awhile. Before he got the iPhone. You can basically do the same thing on an iPhone but with the iPhone being even more portable and easier to use. But yeah, I don't see a big market for tablet anything's right now. I wouldn't mind having an iPhone style-like device the size of a Kindle or a bit larger that would be an e-reader/web browser + be able to run iPhone/iTouch-like apps though.
  • Yeah - it's definitely not a mainstream device yet, but I think the market is already made it just doesn't know it yet. I guess we'll see, but that Hearst and B&N seem to be looking to enter the market makes me think that they, knowing something that we don't, are confident in the market.

    On the tablet pc front - there's been a few that have tried to come out that weren't swivel top laptops. Nokia's 770 and 800 went pretty much nowhere. I seem to recall another one awhile back that had like a person's name - cisco? I can't remember, but it was also just a flat screen that you could write on. Something nobody has wanted thus far - nobody except the tech companies.
  • Ken - their market to lose indeed. If I was a betting man, I wouldn't bet against them on this front, either! :)
  • I still don't see many people with these things. My coworkers and I excluded, I've only seen three others on the train ever since the original Kindle came out. And only one of those was a Kindle 2. And I have yet to see a non-Kindle e-reader in the wild. As you said, the available library still needs a lot of work. So I think "only total geeks and people with more disposable income than sense" are still the only ones buying them.

    As for tablet PCs, they've sucked because all they've been so far are laptops with a swiveling screen. Unless you can make one that's around a pound (preferably less) and at most half an inch thick, nobody except the ubergeeks will want to use one on a regular basis. Arrington's web tablet is about as close to something I'd actually use than everything that's come along so far but even then it's just a web tablet and not a full-blown PC.
  • Agreed, Felix. It's just a gut feeling I get, but pretty much same as you...it appears we may be over the hump this time. The Kindle may or may not be the ultimate winner here, but I think the e-reader has finally broken out of the "only total geeks buy these things" niche. And the Kindle itself is certainly in the driver's seat; it's their market to lose, IMO. Not that it couldn't happen, but I think they'd have to do it to themselves.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Not Found

Sorry, but what you are looking for isn't here...